Eynard v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP

Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff: Henry Eynard
Case Number: 5:2012cv00053
Filed: May 4, 2012
Court: North Carolina Western District Court
Office: Statesville Office
County: Lincoln
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1446
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 26, 2012 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ordering that parties file a Stipulation of Dismissal, or in the alternative, request an extension of time to file such dismissal on or before 11/30/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/26/2012. (cbb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eynard v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Represented By: K. Neal Davis
Represented By: Justin N. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henry Eynard
Represented By: Jason Edward Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.