Saunders v. Crow et al
| Ryan Scott Saunders |
| John Crow, Sorrell Saunders and NC Department of Corrections |
| 5:2012cv00060 |
| May 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Statesville Office |
| Lincoln |
| Robert J. Conrad |
| Civil Rights |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER denying 22 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 08/31/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh)
|
|
Filing
21
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 12/18/2014. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(cbb)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER instructing plaintiff to provide his new address to the Clerk's Office within 14 days from entry of this Order. Failure to provide current address will result in dismissal. Plaintiff's responses due by 12/11/2014. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 11/24/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(smj)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER directing Clerk to prepare process for each dft and deliver process to the US Marshal. USM shall serve process upon each dft. Each dft should file a response to plf's allegations in accordance with the Fed Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 7/3/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(cbb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
