Rose et al v. BrightStar Franchising, LLC

Defendant: BrightStar Franchising, LLC
Plaintiff: D. Cameron Rose, Jr. and Danielle M. Rose
Case Number: 5:2013cv00021
Filed: February 5, 2013
Court: North Carolina Western District Court
Office: Statesville Office
County: Iredell
Referring Judge: David Keesler
Presiding Judge: Richard Voorhees
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rose et al v. BrightStar Franchising, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BrightStar Franchising, LLC
Represented By: Melissa A. Romanzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: D. Cameron Rose, Jr.
Represented By: Stephen J. Romeo
Represented By: Elliot Alexander Fus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle M. Rose
Represented By: Stephen J. Romeo
Represented By: Elliot Alexander Fus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.