Prime Choice Services, Inc. v. Schneider Logistics Transloading and Distribution, Inc.
Prime Choice Services, Inc. |
Schneider Logistics Transloading and Distribution, Inc. |
5:2013cv00148 |
November 1, 2013 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Statesville Office |
Catawba |
David S. Cayer |
Richard Voorhees |
Negotiable Instrument |
Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Prime Choice Services, Inc. v. Schneider Logistics Transloading and Distribution, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Schneider Logistics Transloading and Distribution, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Andrew Pfohl Flynt |
Represented By: | Dana H. Hoffman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Prime Choice Services, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Paul Everett Culpepper |
Represented By: | Timothy D. Swanson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.