RPM Plastics, LLC v. Joe Tex, Inc.
RPM Plastics, LLC |
Joe Tex Xpress, Inc. |
5:2014cv00050 |
April 14, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Statesville Office |
Iredell |
David S. Cayer |
Richard Voorhees |
Other Personal Property Damage |
49 U.S.C. ยง 14706 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER denying dft Joe Tex Xpress, Inc.'s 15 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 11/21/2014. (cbb) |
Filing 20 CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 6/12/14. (smj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: RPM Plastics, LLC v. Joe Tex, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RPM Plastics, LLC | |
Represented By: | Stuart Hale Russell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Joe Tex Xpress, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Christopher Mark Kelly |
Represented By: | Gillian Shannon Crowl |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.