Nichols v. USA
Petitioner: Hayward Jerome Nichols
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 5:2016cv00102
Filed: June 15, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Statesville Office
County: Catawba
Presiding Judge: Richard Voorhees
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 11/14/2018. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (nvc)
April 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting Petitioner's 8 Motion to Stay. This action is held in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's resolution of United States v. Thilo Brown, Case No. 16-7056. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 4/17/2018. (ejb)
May 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting 6 Motion to Stay. This action is held in abeyance pending the Fourth Circuit's decision in United States v. Brown, Case No. 16-7056. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 5/8/2017. (tmg)
December 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting Respondent's 3 Motion to hold Petitioner's § 2255 Motion to Vacate in abeyance. The above-captioned action is held in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decision in Beckles v. United States, No. 15-8544. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 12/27/2016. (kby)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?