Speagle v. USA
John Andrew Speagle, Sr. |
USA |
5:2016cv00119 |
June 22, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Statesville Office |
Catawba |
Richard Voorhees |
Motions to Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER granting 4 Motion to Stay. (cbb) This matter is held in abeyance pending Supreme Court's decision in Beckles. Thereafter, Respondent has 60 days from date of Supreme Court decision to file a response to petr's 2255 motion to vacate. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 10/7/2016. (cbb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Speagle v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: John Andrew Speagle, Sr. | |
Represented By: | Joshua Carpenter |
Represented By: | Caleb Hill Newman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.