Dishmond v. Colvin
Phyllis Cooke Dishmond |
Carolyn W. Colvin |
5:2016cv00187 |
October 14, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Statesville Office |
Iredell |
Max O. Cogburn |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 8/21/2017. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (nvc) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting 18 Motion to Substitute Party. Rickey Dishmond shall be SUBSTITUTED as plaintiff in his role as Administrator of Phyllis Cooke Dishmonds estate. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 6/2/2017. (tmg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dishmond v. Colvin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Phyllis Cooke Dishmond | |
Represented By: | Beth R. Setzer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.