Benfield v. Perry et al
| Jeremy Lynn Benfield |
| Frank L. Perry and Nora Hunt |
| 5:2017cv00021 |
| January 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Statesville Office |
| Iredell |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 1/26/2018. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nvc)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER granting 4 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner shall, within 21 days from entrance of this Order, file a response explaining why his § 2254 Petition should not be dismissed as untimely, plus an additional 3 days if served by mail. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 5/31/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nvc)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER that within 21 days of entrance of this Order, Petitioner shall file: 1) evidence that he placed his § 2254 Petition and Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs in the prison mail sy stem on or about October 23, 2016; or 2) an application to proceed without prepaying fees and costs that reflects his financial situation as it existed on or about January 17, 2017. ( Responses due by 2/21/2017 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail). Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 01/27/17. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(emw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
