MSCI 2007-HQ12 Phillips Lane, LLC v. Austin
Appellant: MSCI 2007-HQ12 Phillips Lane, LLC
Appellee: Larry Dean Austin
Case Number: 5:2017cv00043
Filed: March 2, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Statesville Office
County: Catawba
Presiding Judge: Richard Voorhees
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order that this Appeal is DISMISSED without prejudice as MOOT. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 2/27/18. (tmg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MSCI 2007-HQ12 Phillips Lane, LLC v. Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: MSCI 2007-HQ12 Phillips Lane, LLC
Represented By: Thomas William Waldrep, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Larry Dean Austin
Represented By: David Russell Badger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?