Fraley v. Doe et al
Shawn Germaine Fraley |
John Doe, FNU Johnson and FNU Goins |
5:2017cv00075 |
April 28, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Statesville Office |
Alexander |
Frank D. Whitney |
Civil Rights |
Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER denying 50 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 12/7/2018. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg) |
Filing 49 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 10/30/2018. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nvc) |
Filing 35 ORDER denying 33 Motion for Default Judgment and denying 34 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/28/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nvc) |
Filing 31 ORDER denying 30 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/13/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg) |
Filing 21 ORDER denying 19 Motion to Appoint Counsel and 20 Motion to Have Evidence Added. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 8/17/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nvc) |
Filing 13 ORDER directing Alexander Correctional Institution to identify the John Doe defendant within 10 days. Plaintiff to submit summons for service of process by USM. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 6/24/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.