Statesville Roofing & Building Restoration, Inc. v. Tilghman Beach and Racquet Club Condominium Association, Inc.
Plaintiff: Statesville Roofing & Building Restoration, Inc.
Defendant: Tilghman Beach and Racquet Club Condominium Association, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2017cv00186
Filed: October 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Statesville Office
County: Iredell
Presiding Judge: David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge: Frank D. Whitney
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Statesville Roofing & Building Restoration, Inc. v. Tilghman Beach and Racquet Club Condominium Association, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Statesville Roofing & Building Restoration, Inc.
Represented By: Douglas G. Eisele
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tilghman Beach and Racquet Club Condominium Association, Inc.
Represented By: Joshua D. Spencer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?