Greene v. Parsons et al
Trevor Stanley Greene |
Jerry Parsons and Dallas Wyatt |
5:2019cv00054 |
May 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Kenneth D Bell |
David S Cayer |
Max O Cogburn |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 6/25/2019. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nvc) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting for limited purpose of this review #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's #1 Complaint is dismissed as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. Signed by District Judge Kenneth D. Bell on 6/25/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nvc) |
Case reassigned to District Judge Kenneth D. Bell. District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr no longer assigned to the case. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(nvc) |
Motion referred to David S. Cayer: #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis (tmg) |
Case assigned to Max Cogburn and to Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. (nvc) Modified on 5/8/2019 (tmg). |
Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Trevor Stanley Greene. (nvc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Trevor Stanley Greene. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Subpoenas, #3 Proposed Summons)(nvc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.