Testerman v. Iredell Memorial Hospital, Inc.
Monica Testerman |
Iredell Memorial Hospital, Inc. |
5:2019cv00139 |
October 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Kenneth D Bell |
David Keesler |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by all Parties by Monica Testerman (Tew, Clark) |
Filing 5 Parties Notice of Settlement. COURT NOTICE to the Parties: Agreement for entry of judgment or a stipulation of dismissal to be filed within 30 days or the court will dismiss the case without prejudice. Case Settlement Deadline 12/13/2019. (Rainey, Richard) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Delayed Certificate of Settlement Conference by Iredell Memorial Hospital, Inc. (Rainey, Richard) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint contained in #1 Notice of Removal, by Iredell Memorial Hospital, Inc..(Rainey, Richard) |
NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 7 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 11/21/2019. (nvc) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Iredell Memorial Hospital, Inc. (Rainey, Richard) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Iredell County Superior Court, case number 19-CVS-2755. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4234028), filed by Iredell Memorial Hospital, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal)(Rainey, Richard) |
Clerk's Entry and Service of #Standing Order Requiring an Initial Settlement Conference in Civil Cases assigned to the Honorable Kenneth D. Bell (5:19-mc-5 (Doc. No. 1)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. The filing party is directed to serve a copy of the Order with service. (nvc) |
Case assigned to District Judge Kenneth D. Bell and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(nvc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Testerman v. Iredell Memorial Hospital, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Iredell Memorial Hospital, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Richard Lee Rainey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Monica Testerman | |
Represented By: | Clark Daniel Tew |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.