Tucker v. Saul
Plaintiff: James Melvin Tucker
Defendant: Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 5:2020cv00072
Filed: June 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Max O Cogburn
Referring Judge: W Carleton Metcalf
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY Order of Referral - Social Security. Pursuant to the Standing Order 3:13MC95, 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 72.1 this case is referred to a United States Magistrate Judge to make findings of fact, conclusions of law and to recommend disposition of any dispositive motion filed through submission of a Memorandum and Recommendation to the District Judge. Case referred to Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Entered by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 7/1/2020. (ams)
June 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Hannalore Burns Merritt for James Melvin Tucker. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 6/12/2020. (tmg)
June 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Andrew Saul, US Attorney and US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM 285 Forms) (tmg)
June 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk shall issue summons to US Marshal for service. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 6/8/2020. (tmg)
June 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Hannalore Burns Merritt Filing fee $ 281, receipt number 0419-4520964. by James Melvin Tucker. (Attachments: #1 Appendix court admissions suppl, #2 Affidavit, #3 Appendix client consent, #4 Appendix certif good standing, #5 Proposed Order)(Eaglin, Paul)
June 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (tmg)
June 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Melvin Tucker. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Eaglin, Paul)
June 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by James Melvin Tucker. (Attachments: #1 Appendix AC denial of review, #2 Cover Sheet)(Eaglin, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tucker v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Melvin Tucker
Represented By: Paul B. Eaglin
Represented By: Hannalore Burns Merritt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?