Helms v. USA
| 5:2020cv00085 |
| November 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Statesville Office |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 10/8/2021. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nvc)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER that the parties shall have (10) days from this Order in which to respond to this Order showing cause why the stay in this matter should not be lifted in light of Greer v. United States. If Petitioner does not withdraw h is motion, the Court shall lift the stay in this matter and order the Government to respond to the Petitioner's Section 2255 Motion to Vacate.Signed by District Judge Kenneth D. Bell on 6/18/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nvc)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting 2 and 4 Motion to Stay. The Government shall respond to the Petitioner's Motion to Vacate within 30 days of the Fourth Circuit's mandate in United States v. Gary. Signed by District Judge Kenneth D. Bell on 11/24/2020. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Helms v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
