Brown v. Hernandez et al
| Marcus Randall Brown |
| Sophia Feaster, M. Dula, Amy Jenkins, Carlos Hernandez and John/Jane Doe |
| 5:2021cv00024 |
| February 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Statesville Office |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of and directing correctional facility to transmit payments. Signed by Clerk of Court on 2/25/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (rhf)
|
| Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Sealed - Court) (nvc) |
| Filing 5 Prisoner Admin Remedy Statement by Marcus Randall Brown (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nvc) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (hms)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER of INSTRUCTIONS to Plaintiff pursuant to Standing Order 3:19-mc-54. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns (Pro se litigant served by US Mail) (tmg)
|
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) by Marcus Randall Brown (Attachments: #1 Trust Fund Statement) (tmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John/Jane Doe, M. Dula, Sophia Feaster, Carlos Hernandez, Amy Jenkins with Jury Demand filed by Marcus Randall Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (tmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
