Kurkowski v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff: John M. Kurkowski
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 5:2021cv00131
Filed: August 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Kenneth D Bell
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Ewing, B.)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 NOTICE of Certificate of Settlement Conference Pursuant to Standing Order 5:19-mc-5. Result: Unable to resolve. (Ewing, B.)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Pro Se RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by John M. Kurkowski. Replies due by 10/27/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 First Request for Admissions, #2 Exhibit 2 Email) (tms)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE of Certificate of Settlement Conference Pursuant to Standing Order 5:19-mc-5 by Plaintiff John M. Kurkowski. Result: Unable to resolve. (tms)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Mail (Order Doc. No. 11) addressed to John M. Kurkowski returned as undeliverable. Unable to Forward. (tms)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Mail (Order Doc. No. 10) addressed to John M. Kurkowski returned as undeliverable. Unable to Forward (tms)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER re #8 Motion for Extension of Time. In the motion for an extension of time, Plaintiff also objected to the removal of this action and moved this Court to remand the case to state court. For the reasons discussed in this Order, the Court will deny the motion to remand. Signed by District Judge Kenneth D. Bell on 9/20/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nvc)
September 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff shall have up to and including 10/21/2021 to respond to Defendant's motion. Signed by District Judge Kenneth D. Bell on 9/20/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nvc)
September 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Ewing, B.)
September 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Pro Se MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and OBJECTION to Removal Request for Settlement Conference #7 Notice by John M. Kurkowski. Responses due by 9/29/2021 (tmg)
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Regarding Court's Standing Order Requiring An Initial Settlement Conference in the Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Kenneth D. Bell by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. re Judge Bell Civil Standing Order Requiring ISC, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Ewing, B.)
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Ewing, B.)
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Responses due by 9/21/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Ewing, B.)
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. re Judge Bell Civil Standing Order Requiring ISC, Case Assigned/Reassigned, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Ewing, B.)
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Clerk's Entry and Service of #Standing Order Requiring an Initial Settlement Conference in Civil Cases assigned to the Honorable Kenneth D. Bell (5:19-mc-5 (Doc. No. 1)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. The filing party is directed to serve a copy of the Order with service. (nvc)
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Case assigned to District Judge Kenneth D. Bell. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(nvc)
August 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Ewing, B.)
August 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by B. Chad Ewing on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Ewing, B.)
August 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Lincoln County Superior Court, case number 21-CVS-00871. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5189102), filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Cover Sheet)(Ewing, B.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kurkowski v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John M. Kurkowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Represented By: B. Chad Ewing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?