Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. C&S Rail Services, LLC
Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
C&S Rail Services, LLC |
5:2022cv00118 |
August 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Kenneth D Bell |
David S Cayer |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certificate of Service)(Kelly, Christopher) |
SECOND Notice to Donald R. McMinn: Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1 you are required to Register for E-Filing Access or Link Existing Account #Link. (Attorney served via NEF) Deadline by 9/19/2022. (rth) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Donald R. McMinn for Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Pro Hac Vice Attorney served via NEF). Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 9/1/22. (mga) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Donald R. McMinn Filing fee $ 288, receipt number ANCWDC-5724951. by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Kelly, Christopher). Motions referred to David S. Cayer. |
Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to C&S Rail Services, LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (brl) |
Notice to Donald R. McMinn: Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1 you are required to Register for E-Filing Access or Link Existing Account #Link. (Attorney served via NEF) Deadline by 9/8/2022. (mga) |
Filing 3 Amended Corporate Disclosure Statement by Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Kelly, Christopher) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Kelly, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against C&S Rail Services, LLC with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5722043), filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Kelly, Christopher) |
Case assigned to District Judge Kenneth D. Bell and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(ef) |
Clerk's Entry and Service of #Standing Order Requiring an Initial Settlement Conference in Civil Cases assigned to the Honorable Kenneth D. Bell (5:19-mc-5 (Doc. No. 1)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. The filing party is directed to serve a copy of the Order with service. (ef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. C&S Rail Services, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
Represented By: | Christopher M. Kelly |
Represented By: | Donald R. McMinn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: C&S Rail Services, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.