Mays v. Polishchuk et al
| Foster Mays |
| Oleg Polishchuk doing business as POP Trucking, Uber Freight, LLC and Oleg Polishchuk an individual and doing business as POP Trucking |
| 5:2023cv00073 |
| May 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Kenneth D Bell |
| David Keesler |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Supplemental Authority by Uber Freight, LLC re #13 Memorandum in Support of Motion (Bader, Steven) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Oleg Polishchuk.(Adams, Randall) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Uber Freight, LLC. (Harris, Jason) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Uber Freight, LLC. Responses due by 8/1/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Rate Confirmation Sheet, #2 Exhibit 2-Broker-Carrier Agreement, #3 Exhibit 3-Bill of Lading, #4 Exhibit 4-FMCSA Company Snapshot) (Harris, Jason). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven A. Bader on behalf of Uber Freight, LLC (Bader, Steven) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Certificate of Settlement Conference Pursuant to Standing Order 5:19-mc-5. Result: Unable to resolve. (Harris, Jason) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint . Uber Freight, LLC answer due 7/18/2023. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a Certificate of Initial Settlement Conference before filing an Answer. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 6/20/2023. (brl)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Uber Freight, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Extension of Time) (Harris, Jason). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Richard Harris on behalf of Uber Freight, LLC (Harris, Jason) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Oleg Polishchuk. Oleg Polishchuk waiver sent on 5/26/2023, answer due 7/25/2023. (Adams, Randall) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Oleg Polishchuk. (Adams, Randall) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Randall R. Adams on behalf of Oleg Polishchuk (Adams, Randall) |
| Filing 3 Summons Reissued Electronically as to Oleg Polishchuk, Uber Freight, LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(ams) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Oleg Polishchuk, Uber Freight, LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(cjs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-6082637), filed by Foster Mays.(Levine, Michael) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Kenneth D. Bell and US Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(cjs) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Standing Order Requiring an Initial Settlement Conference in Civil Cases assigned to the Honorable Kenneth D. Bell (5:19-mc-5 (Doc. No. 1)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. The filing party is directed to serve a copy of the Order with service. (cjs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
