Men et al v. Blinken et al
Phoeurn Men and Case Farms Processing Inc. |
Anthony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland, Richard Visek, W. Patrick Murphy and Scott Sternberg |
5:2023cv00143 |
September 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Kenneth D Bell |
David Keesler |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE: Case was filed in wrong division. Case has been copied from 3:23-cv-569 to 5:23-cv-143. Please use 5:23-cv-143 for all future pleadings. (ef) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Anthony Blinken, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, W. Patrick Murphy, Scott Sternberg, Richard Visek. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (jm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-6211975), filed by Case Farms Processing Inc, Phoeurn Men. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit I-140 Approval Notice, #3 Exhibit NVC Appointment Letter, #4 Exhibit Employer Letter)(Parsonage, Helen) |
Case assigned to Senior District Judge Kenneth D. Bell, Jr and US Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(jm) Modified text on 9/13/2023 (jm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.