Mitchell v. Universal Protection Service, LLC et al
| Mark Mitchell |
| Google LLC, Universal Protection Service, LLC doing business as Allied Universal Security Services and Google Inc. |
| 5:2023cv00165 |
| October 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Kenneth D Bell |
| David Keesler |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #18 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Responses due by 12/18/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/8/23. (mga)
|
| Filing 18 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Mark Mitchell. Responses due by 12/22/2023 (Tew, Clark). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added David C. Hamilton for Universal Protection Service, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Attorney served via NEF). Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/28/23. (mga)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #14 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Chase Martenson for Universal Protection Service, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Attorney served via NEF). Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/28/23. (mga)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to David C. Hamilton Filing fee $ 288, receipt number ANCWDC-6309727. by Universal Protection Service, LLC. (Raab, Christopher). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Chase Martenson Filing fee $ 288, receipt number ANCWDC-6309710. by Universal Protection Service, LLC. (Raab, Christopher). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Notice to Chase Martenson: Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1 you are required to Register for E-Filing Access or Link Existing Account #Link. (Attorney served via NEF) Deadline by 12/5/2023. (mga) |
| Notice to David C. Hamilton: Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1 you are required to Register for E-Filing Access or Link Existing Account #Link. (Attorney served via NEF) Deadline by 12/5/2023. (mga) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Certificate of Settlement Conference Pursuant to Standing Order 5:19-mc-5. Result: Unable to resolve. by Christopher P. Raab on behalf of Universal Protection Service, LLC (Raab, Christopher) Modified text on 11/28/2023 (mek). |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Google LLC, Universal Protection Service, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - EEOC Charge of Discrimination (Mitchell - Google), #2 Exhibit B - EEOC Charge of Discrimination (Mitchell - Allied))(Lucchesi, Kathleen) (Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 replaced on 11/28/2023) (mek). |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Google LLC, Universal Protection Service, LLC. Responses due by 12/11/2023 (Lucchesi, Kathleen). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting Defendants' #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint contained within Notice of Removal. Google LLC answer due 11/27/2023; Universal Protection Service, LLC answer due 11/27/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/20/23. (mga)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint by Google LLC, Universal Protection Service, LLC. Responses due by 12/4/2023 (Lucchesi, Kathleen). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting Defendant Universal Protection Service, LLC's #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint contained in the Notice of Removal. Universal Protection Service, LLC answer due 11/20/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/18/23. (mga)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint by Universal Protection Service, LLC. (Raab, Christopher). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting Defendant Google LLC's #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint contained in the Notice of Removal. Google LLC answer due 11/20/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/17/23. (mga)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint by Google LLC. (Lucchesi, Kathleen). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Google LLC. (Lucchesi, Kathleen) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen Kanable Lucchesi on behalf of Google LLC (Lucchesi, Kathleen) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Universal Protection Service, LLC. (Raab, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from North Carolina General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, Caldwell County, case number 23CVS1140. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-6256178), filed by Google LLC, Universal Protection Service, LLC.(Raab, Christopher) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Standing Order Requiring an Initial Settlement Conference in Civil Cases assigned to the Honorable Kenneth D. Bell (5:19-mc-5 (Doc. No. 1)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. The filing party is directed to serve a copy of the Order with service. (jm) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Kenneth D. Bell and US Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(jm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
