Rose v. Mooresville Police Department
| Nathaniel D. Rose |
| Mooresville Police Department |
| 5:2024cv00072 |
| February 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Kenneth D Bell |
| Susan C Rodriguez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 REPLY to Response to Motion re #2 MOTION to Dismiss by Mooresville Police Department. (Stewart, Jake) |
| Filing 5 Pro Se RESPONSE to Motion re #2 MOTION to Dismiss by Nathaniel D. Rose. Replies due by 3/29/2024 (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(cjs) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Certificate of Settlement Conference Pursuant to Standing Order 5:19-mc-5. Result: Unable to resolve. (Stewart, Jake) Modified text on 3/8/2024 to correct result (mek). |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Submit Certification of Settlement Conference by Mooresville Police Department. Responses due by 3/21/2024 (Stewart, Jake). Motions referred to Susan C. Rodriguez. |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss by Mooresville Police Department. Responses due by 3/21/2024 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum In support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2) (Stewart, Jake). Motions referred to Susan C. Rodriguez. |
| TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Submit Certification of Settlement Conference. Certificate of Settlement Conference due by 3/21/2024. So Ordered. Entered by US Magistrate Judge Susan C. Rodriguez on 3/7/2024. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(DLG) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Iredell County Superior Court, case number 24-CVS-327. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCWDC-6421736), filed by Mooresville Police Department. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Pleadings, #2 Exhibit Notice of Removal to State Ct.)(Stewart, Jake) Modified docket text on 2/29/2024 (tlj). |
| Case assigned to District Judge Kenneth D. Bell and US Magistrate Judge Susan C. Rodriguez. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(tlj) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Standing Order Requiring an Initial Settlement Conference in Civil Cases assigned to the Honorable Kenneth D. Bell (5:19-mc-5 (Doc. No. 1)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. The filing party is directed to serve a copy of the Order with service. (tlj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rose v. Mooresville Police Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nathaniel D. Rose | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mooresville Police Department | |
| Represented By: | Jake William Stewart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
