Midcontinent Communications v. North Dakota Public Service Commission et al
| Midcontinent Communications |
| North Dakota Public Service Commission, Kevin Cramer, Tony Clark, Brian Kalk and Missouri Valley Communications Inc |
| 1:2009cv00017 |
| April 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Southwestern Office |
| Burleigh |
| Daniel L. Hovland |
| Charles S. Miller |
| None |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 252 Telecommunications Act of 1996 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER by Judge Daniel L. Hovland adopting 46 Report and Recommendations; denying 8 Motion to Dismiss; denying 19 Motion to Dismiss.(MMF)
|
|
Filing
46
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 19 MOTION to Dismiss filed by North Dakota Public Service Commission, 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Missouri Valley Communications Inc. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER adopting 44 Stipulation for Extension of Time. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER adopting 22 Stipulation for Extension of Time. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 3 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice (J.G. Harrington); granting 4 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice (David E. Mills) (BG) Distributed on 4/14/2009 (rm).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
