Cochell v. Pokorny Chiropractic Clinic et al
Melissa Cochell |
Pokorny Chiropractic Clinic, David Pokorny DC, Richard Pokorny DC, Sheldon Gordon DC and Jeffrey D Pokorny DC |
1:2009cv00031 |
June 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Southwestern Office |
Stark |
Daniel L. Hovland |
Charles S. Miller |
Plaintiff |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER adopting 32 Stipulation To Extend Deadlines. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) |
Filing 31 ORDER (amended) re supplement briefing on Defendant Pokorny Chiropractic Clinic's pending 10 MOTION to Dismiss. (Amending the date on which responses to Defendant's supplement brief are due) By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) |
Filing 30 ORDER re supplement briefing on Defendant Pokorny Chiropractic Clinic's pending 10 MOTION to Dismiss. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) |
Filing 20 ORDER by Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland re 15 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Melissa Cochell. (LR) |
Filing 18 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 9/10/2009 at 9:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) |
Filing 14 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 3 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice (James M Ragain); granting 4 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice (John R Christensen). (BG) Distributed on 7/13/2009 (ks). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.