Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company v. Factory Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company
Defendant: Factory Mutual Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2009cv00034
Filed: June 29, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of North Dakota
Office: Southwestern Office
County: Burleigh
Presiding Judge: Daniel L. Hovland
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Miller
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 206 ORDER adopting 203 Stipulation filed by Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (CAS)
August 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting in part and denying in part 38 Defendant's Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 44 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. (CAS)
August 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER adopting parties' stipulation, filed at docket no. 84 , amending briefing schedule and extending expert witness deadlines. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (CAS)
July 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. finding as moot 46 Motion to Strike; granting 48 Motion to Supplement Mootion to Compel (BG)
July 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER re discovery motions. Parties are file their respective discovery motions by 7/13/2010. Responses to these motions by 7/20/2010. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
March 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER re dispositive motion deadline. Dispositive Motions due by 10/1/2010. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
August 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/25/2011 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
July 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 14 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice (Bruce A. Featherstone); granting 15 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice (John A. DeSisto). (BG) Distributed on 7/29/2009 (ks).
July 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 8/21/2009 at 9:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
July 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 5 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice (David A. Luttinger, Jr.). (BG) Distributed on 7/1/2009 to David A. Luttinger, Jr. (rs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company v. Factory Mutual Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company
Represented By: Rebecca S. Thiem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Factory Mutual Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?