Odom v. Kaizer
Charles Odom |
Kenan Kaizer |
1:2010cv00085 |
November 18, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Southwestern Office |
Burleigh |
Daniel L. Hovland |
Charles S. Miller |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 89 ORDER re additional briefing. Additional briefs due by 1/17/2013. Responsive briefs due by 1/24/2013. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) |
Filing 84 ORDER: The final pretrial set for 7/02/2013 and the trial set for 7/16/2013 are cancelled. Both shall be rescheduled as necessary at a date and time to be determined. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) |
Filing 73 SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.Discovery due by 2/1/2013. Plaintiff(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 1/1/2013. Defendant(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 2/1/2013. Amended Pleadings due by 11/12/2012. Dispositive Motions due by 3/15/2013. Discovery depositions of expert witnesses due by 3/1/2013. (BG) |
Filing 71 ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/2/2013 at 1:30 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) |
Filing 63 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. denying 42 Motion for Discovery without prejudice; granting in part and denying in part 57 Motion to Take Deposition and for Appointment of Counsel. Court appoints attorney Jeff Weikum to represent plaintiff in this action. (BG) |
Filing 62 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Daniel L. Hovland. Order adopts 58 Report and Recommendation in its entirety and denies Kaizer's 44 Motion to Dismiss. (QF) Distributed on 8/1/2012 (jt). |
Filing 53 ORDER: The final pretrial conference scheduled for 7/16/2012 and trial scheduled for 7/31/2012 are cancelled. Both shall be rescheduled at a date and time to be determined. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) |
Filing 39 ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/16/2012 at 1:30 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) Distributed to Charles Odom on 11/21/2011. (rs) |
Filing 9 ORDER by Judge Daniel L. Hovland adopting 6 Report and Recommendations; dismissing complaint without prejudice; and finding as moot 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (RAB) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re Complaint and 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles Odom. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (CAS) Mailed copy to Mr. Odom. (jd). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Odom v. Kaizer | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Charles Odom | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kenan Kaizer | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.