Skalicky v. Braun et al
| Thomas Alan Skalicky |
| Lean Bersearch, Kolby Braun and Troy Schutz |
| 1:2012cv00061 |
| May 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Southwestern Office |
| Burleigh |
| Charles S. Miller |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. denying 29 Motion for Discovery without prejudice. (BG)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER (amended) finding as moot defendants' 23 MOTION to Dismiss and further directing service on defendants. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (amended to correct caption) (BG) Distributed on 7/27/2012 (jt).
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. finding as moot 23 Motion to Dismiss and further directing service on defendants. (BG) Distributed on 7/26/2012 (jt).
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER (amended) denying 8 MOTION for Order of Seizure of Person or Property. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER (AMENDED) granting in part and denying in part 9 MOTION to be Allowed to Submit Exhibits with Attached Arguments. Plaintiff has until 7/09/2012 to file an amended complaint with the court. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.(BG)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. denying 8 Motion for Order of Seizure of Person or Property. (BG) Distributed on 6/8/2012. (rm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
