Sander v. Dickinson et al
| Thomas Sander |
| Dickinson, City of, Kylan Klauzer, Jeremy Moser, Terry Oestreich and Does 1-10 |
| 1:2015cv00072 |
| June 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Southwestern Office |
| Stark |
| Daniel L. Hovland |
| Charles S. Miller |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
AMENDED ORDER granting in part and denying in part 57 MOTION to Compel. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting in part and denying in part 57 Motion to Compel. (BG)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER re 57 MOTION to Compel Information and Items Withheld Under Investigative Privilege filed by Thomas Sander by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. Defendants are to file all documents and materials for which they claim investigative privilege under seal with the court for in camera review within ten (10) days).(ZE)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER: Settlement Conference set for 7/26/2016 at 9:00 AM CT in Bismarck Courtroom 2 before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 13 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Robert L. Stepans. (BG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
