Continental Resources, Inc. v. Reems et al
| Continental Resources, Inc. |
| Ricky L. Reems, Linda Reems and McKenzie Electric Cooperative, Inc. |
| 1:2015cv00076 |
| June 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Southwestern Office |
| Dunn |
| Charles S. Miller |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER Adopting 62 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Continental Resources, Inc. by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (ZE)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER Mandating Mediation by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.(ZE)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 10/25/2016 at 11:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller Jr. by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. The court will initiate the conference call.(ZE)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER: Plaintiff's claim against Defendant McKenzie Electric Cooperative, Inc. is stayed pending further order of the court. Plaintiff shall have until 3/21/2016 to file a dispositive motion regarding its claimed right to construct an electrical line on "Subject Lands." By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 1/21/2016 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
