Groover v. XTO Energy Inc. et al
| Brian Groover |
| XTO Energy Inc., Ross Eriksmoen, Inc., Petroleum Experience Inc. and Allan Kolden |
| 1:2016cv00015 |
| February 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Western Office |
| Divide |
| Daniel L. Hovland |
| Charles S. Miller |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 66 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jesse E. Sater. (BG)
|
|
Filing
63
AMENDED ORDER: The parties have until 6/12/2017 to show cause why this case should not be consolidated with case no. 1:16-cv-10 for trial. Initial disclosures due by 7/17/2017. Dispositive Motions due by 8/1/2018. Parties may immediately commence with discovery. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) (Amended to Correct Scrivener's Error) (BG)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 56 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Breton T. Leone-Quick. (BG) NEF regenerated to PHV attorney on 6/13/2017 (cjs).
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 45 Motion to Substitute Party. (BG)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/9/2018 at 2:00 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
