Carroll et al v. Westby et al
Edward Carroll and Rose Carroll |
Ryan Westby, Randy Westby and R.W. Enterprises, Inc. |
1:2016cv00020 |
February 9, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Western Office |
Ward |
Daniel L. Hovland |
Charles S. Miller |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 41 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Randall D. Moore. (BG) NEF regenerated to PHV attorney on 2/2/2017 (cjs). |
Filing 36 ORDER Adopting 35 Stipulation filed by Edward Carroll, Rose Carroll by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. Discovery due by 5/10/2017. Plaintiff(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 3/1/2017. Defendant(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 4/3/2017. Amended Pleadings due by 1/31/2017, except amendments re punitive damages due by 3/1/2017. (ZE) |
Filing 24 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr denying 17 Motion to Mediate. (ZE) |
Filing 15 ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/6/2017 at 3:00 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) |
Filing 5 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney D. Michael Wallach; granting 4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Cynthia Kent Maragoudakis (BG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.