Enerplus Resources (USA) Corporation v. Wilkinson et al
Enerplus Resources (USA) Corporation |
Wilbur D. Wilkinson, Three Affiliated Tribes, Fort Berthold District Court, Reed Alan Soderstrom and Ervin J. Lee |
1:2016cv00103 |
May 4, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Western Office |
McLean |
Daniel L. Hovland |
Charles S. Miller |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 105 ORDER by Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland denying 93 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 97 Motion for prejudgment interest; granting 98 Motion for Attorney Fees. (MM) |
Filing 75 ORDER by Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland granting 62 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 72 Motion for Hearing (MM) |
Filing 60 ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/22/2017 at 2:00 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) Distributed on 11/9/2016 (cjs). |
Filing 56 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 11/9/2016 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) |
Filing 29 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 28 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Neal S. Cohen. (BG) Regenerated to Attorney Neal S. Cohen on 8/1/2016. Distributed. (rh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.