Slawson Exploration Company, Inc. v. Nine Point Energy, LLC
| Slawson Exploration Company, Inc. |
| Nine Point Energy, LLC |
| 1:2017cv00106 |
| May 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Western Office |
| McKenzie |
| Daniel L. Hovland |
| Charles S. Miller |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER by Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland denying 24 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 29 Motion for Summary Judgment. (NH)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Adopting Stipulation re 42 Stipulation filed by Slawson Exploration Company, Inc. by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.(GD)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr granting 16 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jayvan E. Mitchell; granting 17 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Christopher M. Dressel; granting 18 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Albert L. Hogan III. (BG) NEF regenerated to Attorneys Mitchell, Dressel, and Hogan on 11/13/2017. (rh)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/5/2019 at 11:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller Jr. by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (ZE)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 9/20/2017 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
