Washington v. McLean County Jail et al
Anthony M. Washington |
McLean County Jail and Reliance Telephone Systems |
1:2019cv00124 |
June 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Clare R Hochhalter |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Anthony M. Washington. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(rh) |
Filing 6 COMPLAINT against McLean County Jail, Reliance Telephone Systems filed by Anthony M. Washington. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Mailing Envelope)(am) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF COLLECTION OF FILING FEE sent to McLean County Jail and Anthony M. Washington re #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (am) |
Filing 4 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (BG) Distributed on 6/25/2019 (am). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Anthony M. Washington. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 7/5/2019. (cjs) |
Filing 2 PLRA Packet. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service, #3 Mailing Envelope)(cjs) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony M. Washington. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Inmate Account, #2 Mailing Envelope)(cjs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.