Mitchell v. Kirchmeier et al
| Marcus Mitchell |
| Benjamin Kennelly, George Piehl, Kyle Kirchmeier, Tyler Welk, Morton County, John Does 1-2 and Bismarck, City of |
| 1:2019cv00149 |
| July 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Clare R Hochhalter |
| Daniel L Hovland |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
(Text Only) ORDER REASSIGNING CASE to Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland, as presiding judge, and Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter, as referral judge, for all further proceedings by Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland. Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter no longer assigned as presiding judge.(cjs)
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Marcus Mitchell. (cjs) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Marcus Mitchell. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 8/1/2019. (cjs) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Bismarck, City of, John Does 1-2, Benjamin Kennelly, Kyle Kirchmeier, Morton County, George Piehl, Tyler Welk. (cjs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bismarck, City of, John Does 1-2, Benjamin Kennelly, Kyle Kirchmeier, Morton County, George Piehl, Tyler Welk (Filing fee $400, receipt number 119001206) filed by Marcus Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cjs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
