Kuntz v. Hochalter
Plaintiff: Riley S. Kuntz
Defendant: Clare R. Hochalter
Case Number: 1:2019cv00167
Filed: August 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of North Dakota
Presiding Judge: Daniel L Hovland
Referring Judge: Alice R Senechal
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1442
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by Clare R. Hochalter. (Rockstad, Kent)
August 6, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Clare R. Hochalter from Burleigh Co. District Court, case number unknown. Filing fee waived. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Burleigh Co. Summons, #2 Exhibit B - Burleigh Co. Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Ex. A to Complaint - Law of the Case, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(rh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kuntz v. Hochalter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clare R. Hochalter
Represented By: Kent Rockstad
Represented By: Nicholas W. Chase
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Riley S. Kuntz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?