Garrett v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company
William J. Garrett |
Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
1:2019cv00187 |
September 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Clare R Hochhalter |
Daniel L Hovland |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER: Status Conference set for 9/1/2020 at 9:00 AM in by telephone before Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. By Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. (BG) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Hearing: Jury Trial set for 9/27/2021 at 9:00 AM in Bismarck Courtroom 1 before Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland (4 days). (BG) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/14/2021 at 9:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. By Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. (BG) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. Discovery due by 9/1/2020. Discovery Motions due by 9/1/2020. Plaintiff(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 9/1/2020. Defendant(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 10/1/2020. Join Additional Parties due by 1/1/2020. Amended Pleadings due by 1/1/2020. Nondispositive Motions due by 5/1/2020. Threshold Motions due by 5/1/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 10/19/2020. (BG) |
Filing 4 (Text Only) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter: Scheduling Conference held on 10/18/2019. (BG) |
Filing 3 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 10/18/2019 at 10:30 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. By Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. (BG) |
Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint and Jury Demand filed in Bowman County District Court to document: #1 Notice of Removal, by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Vendsel, Jason) Modified on 9/9/2019 to add docket text re: Bowman County. (as) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company from Bowman County District Court, case number not assigned. Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 319000493 filed by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Bowman County Complaint, #3 Notice of Service of Process, #4 Affidavit of Service by Email, #5 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal)(lf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Garrett v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Jason R. Vendsel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: William J. Garrett | |
Represented By: | Amanda Marie Corey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.