Knowles v. North Dakota, State of et al
Efrain Reyes Knowles |
North Dakota, State of, Bismarck PD, SWATT TEAM and Burleig County Court House |
1:2019cv00227 |
October 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Clare R Hochhalter |
Daniel L Hovland |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER of USCA as to #9 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal filed by Efrain Reyes Knowles. Appellant is directed to pay the $505 filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis by January 9, 2020. (cjs) |
Filing 14 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Bismarck PD, Burleig County Court House, North Dakota, State of, SWATT TEAM against Efrain Reyes Knowles.(am) Distributed on 12/10/2019 (am). |
Filing 13 ORDER by Judge Daniel L. Hovland adopting #8 Report and Recommendations. and denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (kmk) Distributed on 12/10/2019 (am). |
Filing 12 ORDER of USCA as to #9 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal filed by Efrain Reyes Knowles. This case is remanded to the District Court for the limited purpose of determining the Appellant's IFP status. (cjs) |
Filing 11 USCA ORDER Requesting Paper Record of Non-ECF Documents re #9 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal. None exist at this time. (cjs) |
USCA Case Number 19-3628 for #9 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal. (cjs) |
Filing 10 Transmittal of Notice of Appeal Supplement to 8th Circuit Court of Appeals re #9 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal (pb) |
Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet re #9 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal mailed to Efrain Reyes Knowles. (pb) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Efrain Reyes Knowles. Objections to R&R due by 12/6/2019 (as) |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Efrain Reyes Knowles by Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. Objection to R&R due 12/6/2019. (BG) Distributed on 11/21/2019. (rh) Modified on 11/25/2019 to add objection deadline. (as) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL as to #5 Order to Show Cause by Efrain Reyes Knowles. Filing fee: Not paid. (Attachments: #1 Letter from Court of Appeals, #2 Mailing Envelope)(pb) |
Filing 7 (Text Only) ORDER REASSIGNING CASE to Judge Daniel L. Hovland and Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter no longer assigned as presiding judge in the case. by Chief Judge Peter D. Welte.(td) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Efrain Reyes Knowles. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(td) Modified on 11/12/2019 to correct the date of filing. (td). |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. Show Cause Response due by 11/18/2019. (BG) Distributed on 10/29/2019 (am). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Efrain Reyes Knowles. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 11/6/2019. (cjs) |
Filing 3 PLRA Packet. (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #2 Mailing Envelope)(cjs) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Efrain Reyes Knowles. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(cjs) |
Filing 1 Remark: PRISONER LITIGATION PACKET received incomplete. Request to complete PLRA packet sent to inmate. (rh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.