Knowles v. Burleigh County Court House et al
| Efrain Reyes Knowles |
| Sherriffs Department, Burleigh County Court House, Burleigh County and State of North Dakota |
| 1:2019cv00262 |
| November 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Clare R Hochhalter |
| Alice R Senechal |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SECOND NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Efrain Reyes Knowles. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 1/13/2020. (rh) |
Filing 6
(Text Only) ORDER REASSIGNING CASE to Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal for all further proceedings by Chief Judge Peter D. Welte. Distributed.(rh)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter recused. by Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. (BG) Distributed on 12/26/2019. (rh)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Efrain Reyes Knowles. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 1/2/2020. (as) |
| Filing 3 PLRA Packet. (Attachments: #1 Waiver)(as) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Efrain Reyes Knowles. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Inmate Account, #2 Proposed Complaint, #3 Waiver)(as) |
| Filing 1 Remark: PRISONER LITIGATION PACKET received incomplete. Request to complete PLRA packet sent to inmate. (pb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
