McLean-Sheridan Rural Water District v. Merryman Excavation, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: McLean-Sheridan Rural Water District
Defendant: Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and Merryman Excavation, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Case Number: 1:2020cv00004
Filed: January 7, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of North Dakota
Presiding Judge: Clare R Hochhalter
Referring Judge: Daniel L Hovland
2 Judge: Daniel M Traynor
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 3/16/2020 at 9:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. By Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. (BG)
February 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 (Text Only) ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Judge Daniel M. Traynor. Case reassigned to Judge Daniel M. Traynor for all further proceedings. Judge Daniel L. Hovland no longer assigned to the case. (kmk)
January 23, 2020 DOCKET CORRECTION re: #3 NOTICE. Clerk's Office added exhibit description and added a link. (am)
January 22, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal by Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Answer, Affirmative Defense and Counterclaim of Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland) (Feist, Jordan) Modified on 1/23/2020 to add exhibit description and to add link (am).
January 22, 2020 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland identifying Corporate Parent Zurich American Insurance Company for Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland.. (Feist, Jordan)
January 7, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland from McLean County District Court (no case number assigned). Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 120000328 filed by Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(cjs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McLean-Sheridan Rural Water District v. Merryman Excavation, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland
Represented By: Jordan J Feist
Represented By: Ryan Timothy Johnson
Represented By: Cornelius F. Riordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merryman Excavation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: McLean-Sheridan Rural Water District
Represented By: Seth A. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?