Morgan v. Soo Line Railroad Company
Plaintiff: Tommy Morgan
Defendant: Soo Line Railroad Company a Minnesota Corporation doing business as Canadian Pacific
Case Number: 1:2021cv00021
Filed: February 5, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of North Dakota
Presiding Judge: Clare R Hochhalter
Referring Judge: Daniel M Traynor
Nature of Suit: Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 51
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Status Conference set for 10/1/2021 at 9:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. By Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. (BG)
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/24/2022 at 9:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. By Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. (BG)
March 17, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Hearing: Jury Trial set for 6/6/2022 at 9:00 AM in Bismarck Courtroom 1 before Judge Daniel M. Traynor (4 days) (BG)
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. Discovery due by 12/1/2021. Discovery Motions due by 12/1/2021. Plaintiff(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 11/1/2021. Defendant(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 1/2/2022. P Rebuttal Expert Disclosures due by 2/11/2022. Discovery Depositions of Expert Witnesses due by 2/15/2022. Join Additional Parties due by 10/1/2021. Amended Pleadings due by 10/1/2021. Amended Pleadings to Add Punitive Damages due by 12/1/2021. Nondispositive Motions due by 3/1/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 3/1/2022.(BG)
March 17, 2021 Filing 6 (Text Only) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter: Scheduling Conference held on 3/17/2021. (BG)
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 3/17/2021 at 01:30 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. By Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. (JS)
February 15, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint of Plaintiff by Soo Line Railroad Company.(Miller, Lee)
February 12, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tommy Morgan. Soo Line Railroad Company served on 2/8/2021, answer due 3/1/2021 (Bremseth, Fredric)
February 5, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Soo Line Railroad Company. (mf)
February 5, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Soo Line Railroad Company (Filing fee $402, receipt number 121000365) filed by Tommy Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morgan v. Soo Line Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tommy Morgan
Represented By: Fredric A. Bremseth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Soo Line Railroad Company a Minnesota Corporation doing business as Canadian Pacific
Represented By: Sally J. Ferguson
Represented By: Lee A. Miller
Represented By: Allison N. Krueger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?