Wolter v. Federal Public Defenders Office et al
Plaintiff: Robert Andrew Wolter
Defendant: Federal Public Defenders Office, Jason J. Tupman and Edward Werner
Case Number: 1:2021cv00201
Filed: November 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of North Dakota
Presiding Judge: Clare R Hochhalter
Referring Judge: Daniel L Hovland
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2021 Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Distributed on 12/15/2021.(jb)
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER by Judge Daniel L. Hovland adopting #6 Report and Recommendations; and denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (ER) (Main Document 8 replaced on 12/15/2021 to correct a typographical error.) Regenerated NEF and distributed. (jb)
December 2, 2021 Filing 7 OBJECTION by Robert Andrew Wolter to #6 Report and Recommendations. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(mf)
November 17, 2021 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Robert Andrew Wolter by Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. Objections to R&R due by 12/13/2021. (BG) Distributed on 11/17/2021 (mf)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 (Text Only) ORDER REASSIGNING CASE to Judge Daniel L. Hovland, as presiding judge, and Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter, as referral judge, for all further proceedings by Chief Judge Peter D. Welte. Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter, no longer assigned as presiding judge.(jb) Distributed on 11/15/2021. (jb)
November 15, 2021 Filing 4 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Robert Andrew Wolter. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(jb)
November 3, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Robert Andrew Wolter. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 11/17/2021. (mf)
November 3, 2021 Filing 2 PLRA Packet. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Mailing Envelope, #3 Mailing Envelope)(mf)
November 3, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Andrew Wolter. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Inmate Account and Assets)(mf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wolter v. Federal Public Defenders Office et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Andrew Wolter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Public Defenders Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason J. Tupman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Werner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?