Ristine v. Medscan Laboratory, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jill Ristine
Defendant: Medscan Laboratory, Inc. doing business as Adaptive Health Integrations
Case Number: 1:2022cv00079
Filed: May 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of North Dakota
Presiding Judge: Clare R Hochhalter
Referring Judge: Daniel M Traynor
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER by Judge Daniel M. Traynor to Consolidate Cases. (CK) (Main Document 11 replaced on 6/21/2022 to correct typographical errors.) Regenerated NEF. (jb)
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 (Text Only) ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Chief Judge Peter D. Welte. Case reassigned to Judge Daniel M. Traynor, as presiding judge, and Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter, as referral judge, for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter no longer assigned to the case, as referral judge. (kmk)
June 21, 2022 All future pleadings shall be filed in Lead Case No. 1:22-cv-69 (jb)
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 (Text Only) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall have until 6/28/2022 to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. (BG) Modified docket text on 6/7/2022 to correct date. Regenerated NEF. (jb)
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 (Text Only) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Terence R. Coates. (cjs)
May 31, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Medscan Laboratory, Inc.. (Stock, Robert)
May 31, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Attorney Terence R. Coates (Filing fee $150, receipt number ANDDC-2433660) by Jill Ristine. (Coates, Terence) Modified on 5/31/2022 to add receipt number (cjs).
May 31, 2022 Filing 5 SECOND NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Jill Ristine. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 6/7/2022. (cjs)
May 18, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jill Ristine. Medscan Laboratory, Inc. served on 5/10/2022, answer due 5/31/2022 (Prosser, Nathan)
May 9, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Medscan Laboratory, Inc.. (sj)
May 9, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Jill Ristine. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 5/23/2022. (sj)
May 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Medscan Laboratory, Inc. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 322000256) filed by Jill Ristine on behalf of Plaintiff and all others similarly situated (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ristine v. Medscan Laboratory, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jill Ristine
Represented By: McLain J. Schneider
Represented By: Scott A. Haider
Represented By: Terence Coates
Represented By: Nathan D Prosser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medscan Laboratory, Inc. doing business as Adaptive Health Integrations
Represented By: Robert B. Stock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?