Ristine v. Medscan Laboratory, Inc.
Jill Ristine |
Medscan Laboratory, Inc. doing business as Adaptive Health Integrations |
1:2022cv00079 |
May 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Clare R Hochhalter |
Daniel M Traynor |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
All future pleadings shall be filed in Lead Case No. 1:22-cv-69 (jb) |
|
|
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Medscan Laboratory, Inc.. (Stock, Robert) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Attorney Terence R. Coates (Filing fee $150, receipt number ANDDC-2433660) by Jill Ristine. (Coates, Terence) Modified on 5/31/2022 to add receipt number (cjs). |
Filing 5 SECOND NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Jill Ristine. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 6/7/2022. (cjs) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jill Ristine. Medscan Laboratory, Inc. served on 5/10/2022, answer due 5/31/2022 (Prosser, Nathan) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Medscan Laboratory, Inc.. (sj) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Jill Ristine. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 5/23/2022. (sj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Medscan Laboratory, Inc. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 322000256) filed by Jill Ristine on behalf of Plaintiff and all others similarly situated (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.