Hoglund et al v. United States of America et al
Craig Douglas Hoglund and Christine Joan Hoglund |
United States of America, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Internal Revenue Service, Dana (Hill) Fairchild and K Scott Franks |
1:2022cv00153 |
September 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Clare R Hochhalter |
Taxes |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Christine Joan Hoglund. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 10/5/2022. (jb) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Craig Douglas Hoglund. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 10/5/2022. (jb) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Dana (Hill) Fairchild, K Scott Franks, Internal Revenue Service, United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jb) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Christine Joan Hoglund, Craig Douglas Hoglund re #1 Complaint, (jb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Dana (Hill) Fairchild, K Scott Franks, Internal Revenue Service, United States of America (Filing fee $402, receipt number 100000366) filed by Craig Douglas Hoglund, Christine Joan Hoglund. (Attachments: #1 Administrative Claim Letter, #2 Amended Administrative Claim Letter, #3 Response from Internal Revenue Service, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Mailing Envelope)(jb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.