Tarasova v. Lawton et al
| Krystal Marie Tarasova |
| Antony Blinken and Daniel Lawton |
| 1:2024cv00088 |
| May 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Clare R Hochhalter |
| Daniel L Hovland |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
(Text Only) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Defendants shall have until 9/20/2024 to answer or otherwise respond. (BG)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Antony Blinken, Daniel Lawton. (Wall, Sarah) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Krystal Marie Tarasova. Antony Blinken served on 5/28/2024, answer due 7/29/2024; Daniel Lawton served on 5/28/2024, answer due 7/29/2024. (Goldstein, Joshua) (Main Document 3 replaced on 5/31/2024 to remove overlapping headers.) Regenerated NEF. (jb) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Daniel Lawton, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (mf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Antony Blinken, Daniel Lawton (Filing fee $405, receipt number 100002135) filed by Krystal Marie Tarasova. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
