Armstrong v. Grube
Plaintiff: Kurt Armstrong
Defendant: Lawrence Grube
Case Number: 2:2011cv00013
Filed: February 15, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of North Dakota
Office: Northeastern Office
County: Pembina
Presiding Judge: Ralph R. Erickson
Presiding Judge: Karen K. Klein
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 21 and denying Defendant's 5 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson. (SH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Armstrong v. Grube
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kurt Armstrong
Represented By: Duane A. Lillehaug
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lawrence Grube
Represented By: Lawrence D. DuBois
Represented By: Neil W. Fleming
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?