Bruesch v. Netolicky et al
Nicholas Dodge Bruesch |
Brandi Netolicky, Lyle Mee and Paul Belisle |
3:2013cv00050 |
July 8, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Southeastern Office |
Stutsman |
Ralph R. Erickson |
Karen K. Klein |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 101 ORDER ADOPTING 99 and 100 REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 75 Motion for Order to Show Cause; denying 75 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 75 Motion for TRO; granting 78 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 92 Motion for Restraining Order; finding as moot 94 Motion to Continue; and dismissing case without prejudice by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH) |
Filing 81 ORDER ADOPTING 73 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 44 Motion for Order to Show Cause; denying 44 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 44 Motion for TRO; denying 58 Motion for Order to Show Cause; denying 62 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 62 Motion for TRO; and denying 67 Motion for Order to Show Cause by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH) |
Filing 46 ORDER ADOPTING 36 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 11 Motion for TRO; and denying 14 Motion for Order to Show Cause by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH) |
Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and denying 25 Motion for Entry of Default by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.