Giroux v. Cass County Jail et al
| Ellric Alfred Giroux, II |
| Cass County Jail and Cass County Jail Medical Staff |
| 3:2013cv00062 |
| August 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Southeastern Office |
| Cass |
| Ralph R. Erickson |
| Karen K. Klein |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
173
ORDER ADOPTING 163 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting 129 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 131 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 151 Motion to Continue; finding as moot 154 Motion for Discovery and dismissing case with prejudice by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART 113 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; denying without prejudice 91 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying without prejudice 94 Motion for Summary Judgment; and modifying Report and Recommendation to allow Giroux 30 days to appeal the corporal's response by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER ADOPTING 84 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 64 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson. The Cass County Jail is hereby dismissed as a defendant.(SH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
